Sunday, September 27, 2009

Lemon Profiteroles

Choux paste, piped into balls. Filled with lemon curd. Otherwise known as profiteroles, or cream puffs. I think I'll stick with profiterole since cream puff just sounds lame.




Usually these are made with pastry cream as a filling, but I had so much lemon curd left from making three lemon tarts this week so I wanted to use it up. They were pretty awesome.
Speaking of pastry cream, I struck gold on friday. Chef said we could make a tart with pastry cream and flavor it with whatever we wanted. Naturally, I went straight for the booze section in the storage room. I grabbed a bottle of Jim Beam and poured about 30-40g of it into the pastry cream (about 700g of PC). OMFG this was the best thing I've made so far in pastry school. If I ever get my own pastry shop, bourbon pastry cream is gonna be one of my specialties.

I think the tart week was the best week so far. This came as a shock to the chef. He has the impression that I hate being there because I don't smile all the time, or something. I think I need to work on my ass-kissing and bullshitting skills.

Tomorrow we'll be spending the entire day watching a gum paste demo. I honestly don't really know what gum paste is and I don't even care enough to look it up on google. I know it's for wedding cakes and not much else, so I don't give a shit about it. Then the rest of the week is exams.

Tuesday, September 22, 2009

KFC bowls

Never before has someone described exactly the way I feel about something so accurately and eloquently as Patton Oswalt on KFC Bowls.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PnflT0t7wtw&feature=related

Sunday, September 20, 2009

More sorbet formula results

I calculated a bunch more sorbets. It turns out the textbook formula will usually result in an acceptable sweetening power. The reason is because the flaws in the formula cancel eachother out to a certain extent. The assumption that all solids in fruit are fructose makes for an innaccurately high SP. But when you adjust for the correct 170% SP of fructose (from the book's 125%), this usually brings the SP of the mixture just barely back into the recommended range of 25-33%. The textbook formula gets less accurate as the fruit content increases for a given type of fruit.

Still, I think I'll stick to my adjusted formula from now on.

Here are the SP results of all the formulas I've calculated, all using purees with no sugar added, adjusted based on the USDA statistics for the fruit's sugar content:

Banana 60% fruit
Textbook Formula: 32.65 SP
Adjusted Formula: 21.8 SP

Blueberry 50% fruit
TF: 30.77
AF: 26.9

Pear 60% fruit
TF: 31.45
AF: 26.35

Apple 60% fruit
TF: 31
AF: 28.11

Peach 70% fruit
TF: 31.26
AF: 25.33

Apricot 50% fruit
TF: 30.65
AF: 26.23

Apricot 70% fruit
TF: 31.35
AF: 25.16

Blackberry 60% fruit
TF:  31.3
AF: 22.48

Cantaloupe 70% fruit
TF: 30.65
AF: 27.71

Sour Cherry 60% fruit
TF: 31.6
AF: 23.41

Sweet Cherry 60% fruit
TF: 31.6
AF: 25.82

Kiwi 60% fruit
TF: 31.7
AF: 25.55

Pineapple 60% fruit
TF: 31
AF: 26.77

Plum 60% fruit
TF: 31.75
AF: 23.13

Raspberry 50% fruit
TF: 27.95
AF: 24.46

Red Currant 50% fruit
TF: 30.9
AF: 25

Strawberry 70% fruit
TF: 30.82
AF: 25.13

PS: No, I'm not going to "show my work." I don't feel like typing all that shit out. If you want to see the full charts of the ingredients, follow that USDA link, get out your calculator, and do it yourself.

Tuesday, September 15, 2009

Isomalt flower

First day of sugar showpiece week. We started by making isomalt flowers. I'm happy with my first effort:

Saturday, September 5, 2009

Ice cream is fascinating, chocolate candy is boring... who knew?

When I signed up for pastry school and looked over the schedule, two classes stuck out as the ones I was most eager to learn: Chocolate candy and breads.

The two weeks of chocolate candy class ended today, and I'm glad it's over. Chocolate candy is fussy, tedious, repetetive, messy, and just a pain in the ass. Now I know why you need to charge $2 for 20 cents worth of chocolate to make a profit selling chocolate candy.

That's not to say I don't like chocolate. I still love to eat it. I still want to learn more about how to work with it and how to pair chocolate with other flavors. What I know now is that I wouldn't want to be a chocolatier, at least until I somehow had the money to buy all the equipment and/or employees to do the enrobing, molding, piping, and packaging for me.

On the other hand, ice cream is not something I was particularly interested in before the ice cream/sorbet class. I never realized how much scientific knowledge is required to create a good ice cream recipe. Getting the recipe to the right balance of solids, fats, water, air, stabilizers and sweetness is surprisingly complex. So many factors affect the taste, texture and consistency, including the size of the ice crystals. As I pointed out in my previous post, even the formula some professional chefs use to balance IC/sorbet recipes is obviously flawed.

Friday, September 4, 2009

Textbook rant

During the first week of school, one of the chefs said "these are twenty-one thousand dollar books, so take care of them." The $21k referring to the tuiton.

I don't think so. The books have a few problems.

Problem 1: Sometimes a recipe will have an ingredient on the ingredient list, but the directions for the recipe don't say where to add it. It's usually a less significant ingredient like vanilla or salt, but still, wtf? Leaving out the salt or vanilla in a dish can make a big difference in flavor.

Several times I've made the mistake of actually trying to make something by following the recipe in the book. When I'm finished, I'll look on the table and see a little container of salt or half a vanilla bean and be like "fuck, the recipe never said anything about that."

Problem 2: Sometimes the directions are so vague as to render the recipe almost useless without seeing the chefs' demonstration first.

Problem 3: The directions for a few recipes say "make a creme anglaise with the first 4 ingredients." I know how to make a creme anglaise and it's pretty easy, but there's no recipe for creme anglaise in the book. Did they decide to leave it out just because it's so easy? If so, why is there a recipe for simple syrup? Creme anglaise is one of the most basic pastry recipes, I kinda think it should be there at least as a reference.

Problem 4: The ice cream and sorbet balancing formulas are flawed. The formulas make 3 incorrect assumptions.

The first is that all the solid content of fruit is sugar. Fruit contains fiber, vitamins, minerals, fats, and proteins, all of which are solid. For example, bananas (according to the USDA) are 25% solid, but only 12.2% sugar.

The second is that all the sugar in fruit is fructose. This is very wrong. Again using bananas for example, fructose is slightly less than 40% of the total sugar. There's actually more glucose than fructose in a banana.

The third is that the sweetening power of fructose is 125%. According to On Food And Cooking by Harold McGee, fructose has a sweetening power of 170% below 60C, and 120% when heated above 60C. Ice creams and sorbets are obviously well below 60C, so for an IC/sorbet formula, you would need to calculate it as 170%.

What these flaws add up to is an extremely innaccurate result for sweetening power. The only way to get an accurate sweetening power would be to calculate the amounts of sucrose, glucose, and fructose separately, and use the correct 170% sweetness for fructose. Some fruits also contain maltose and galactose, but rarely more than 2% of total sugars.

Using the textbook formula for a banana sorbet recipe with 60% fruit puree (no sugar added) will result in a sweetening power of 32.6%. Near the top of the recommended range of 25-33%. If we use the same 60% banana puree, but calculating the actual sugar content, we get a total sweetening power of 21.8%. The reason for this huge difference in sweetness is because of the large amount of glucose in banana, which is much less sweet than fructose. I haven't tasted a banana sorbet using this formula to create a recipe, but I'm guessing it's not sweet enough.

Tuesday, September 1, 2009

40% bankroll increase!

Tonight I drank a bottle of reisling (ok I didn't drink the whole bottle, I put about 1/4 of it in a risotto) and played some 1c/2c NLH. Won about $8, which brings my roll up to $28.

I cashed out everything in my poker accounts a few months ago and just started playing again, trying to rebuild from nothing by playing freeroll tournaments and microlimits. I took down a 2400 man razz freeroll on Full Tilt for $15 two weeks ago. Playing 8 hours of razz for $15 is not something I'd like to do again.